Fair Launch is currently the hottest trend in DeFi, but the use of interest by the side may mean that the source of the program will work. Honest to whom? It is hard to believe that SushiSwap has been started less than a month ago. Fork Uniswap had an accelerated boom-bust cycle with an abundant amount of opposition, drama and change. Moreover, the greatest influence of SushiSwap has shown on the popularization of the concept of "fair starts". Uniswap attracted $ 11 million from outstanding venture funds, which was not to the liking of the community. In addition, believing in the spirit of decentralization, people believe that all flows should follow the principle of a wide distribution of public currents. Members of the community asked for SushiSwap, because 90% of all tokens had to be transferred to liquidity providers. These same people used to drink Uniswap because the team took over the capital and delayed the launch of the token. Their arguments were simple - Uniswap was frightened by refusing to release a token, in the meantime it would have allowed the members of the DeFi community to share the profits from the circulation. Others argued that asking the team that built Uniswap from scratch and turned it into a potential Coinbase killer to give up their share in the dust was a great deal. Finally, the Uniswap was pebbled on two levels. Bo-first, SushiSwap's "Developers' Fund" has transformed into the personal pension fund of the creator of SushiSwap Chef Nomi. If there was no general hate and threat of deanimization, the creator, hiding in the open, would hide with the money allocated for the improvement of SushiSwap. Bo-second, in the end, Uniswap released a token and its distribution was more fair than most of the DeFi threading from the category of the "club". However, fair play, as they are now understood, destroys the incentives for development. If a person can earn $ 14 million for a week, by simply making a focus of someone's two-year hard work, then what is the need to do the work well enough and do the job well The perfection of fair start-ups Of course, there are exceptions among the fair start-ups. And, judging by everything, one of them is Cream Finance. This project is the Compound link, but to a certain extent it has come to its own thanks to new functions. Cream provides loans and borrowings for a larger number of assets than Compound; the project was a new model of percentage rates, and it also brings up the commissions, pre-set by the flow, to the users (Compound for this purpose) Bo such fopk has meaning. Yes, it uses the Compound base code, but adds new features to it. But most of the honest start-ups have a single purpose - to earn more money for the greed of investors. Cryptocurrency, undoubtedly, is found in the bull market, because of which many users are looking for great profits, but not for authentic innovations. However, the darker side of the clean shutters is an effect that they can have on the developers themselves. Become the founder of the new precursor DeFi protocol: they have spent two years of their lives making food through blood, sweat and tears. Bo the name of decentralization and transparency, the founder makes all the code open. Tokens are referred to, they issue 60% of tokens to the community in the form of bribes for liquidity mining. The employer sells 20% of his current tokens to a group of investors for financing the hiring of employees and expenses for development, testing, auditing and publishing The rest of the tokens are then distributed between the founder and the main team. One month after starting the main line, the project functions normally. However, until the next step, as long as the anonymous Internet printing does not make the protocol overhead. More than that, they say that giving the community only 60% is inappropriate. Instead of this, the fopk will issue 95% of currencies for the community, leaving 3% for the team and 2% for the team. The community is averse to anonymous personnel as a guardian of the "present" decentralization because of its imaginary lack of greed. Some people lose sight of the fact that 2% of tokens for playing a code and participating in a marketing game is not the same thing to spend years of your life on something to spend 20% of the time. With a market capitalization of $ 50 million, this is either $ 1 million for weekly work, or $ 10 million for years of work. Not to mention the fact that this $ 10 million does not include the expenses incurred by the founder to organize and launch the project. Innovation is more expensive for money A clean start-up is a study of the fact that the founders should not divert money from the investor for the start of the program, so here is how There is nothing wrong with releasing the flow and incorporating new functions into it. At the very least, this will help you test a new version of the same protocol on the market in order to rate the demand for a similar service.